Cool Wind

Tonight, I revisited a song from my past. From 1999, “Cool Wind” was a declaration of independence from restrictive belief structures. It has held up well, philosophically, and I find that I am still just as enthusiastic—and adamant—regarding my intellectual freedom.

I’ll say “spiritual” freedom as well, but I am compelled to explain what I mean. I don’t mean that my spirit is free. I mean that I am free from belief in a spirit. I have transcended, as it were, the need to believe in my immortal soul. I am quite certain that I don’t have one.

With no further to-do, here are those lyrics:

There’s a warm sun on my face
And a cool wind at my back
And every step I take leads me onward
I ain’t going back
And I’ve driven full speed down a dead end road before
And I have screamed through a slamming door before
I prayed down on my knees
But now I’m free

Oh it’s a shameful thing
When you lock yourself away
You can’t see through the darkness of your own life
You’ll never find the day
And I have felt the fear surround me
And I have felt the darkness around me
I begged god on my knees
But now I’m free

My life is a precious thing
And I live by my own hand
And I regard my life too sacred
To give to any god or man
And I have bought every myth that’s gone before
And I believed all the lies they told before
I worshipped down on my knees
But now I’m free

There’s a cool wind at my back
And the sun shines on my face
I stretch my arms from east to west
And encompass this whole space
And I have cleansed my soul from every sin
And I have taken up my life again
I’ll never be on my knees
Because I’m free

(“Cool Wind,” Copyright (c) 1999, Kevin Archer)

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

(untitled, re:charisma)

The charismatic

Would do well to remember:

All is illusion.

18 September 2011

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Wedding Music

My friends Jill & Nicki are getting married, thanks to a stroke of fairness from the New York state legislature.

Jill called a few days ago, and asked if I had any song suggestions for the DJ at their reception. Specifically, she asked for country songs, believing that that style was my forte. Well, if you’re talking Hank Sr. or Johnny Cash, yes…but songs of cheatin’ and killin’ just aren’t right for a wedding reception.

Setting aside genre—and gender, for that matter—the big thing she wants is dance music. “I want that dance floor to be full all the time. People of all ages, who like a lot of different styles. We’re pretty eclectic, so give us what ya got!”

Let’s face it, no one can win an eclectic throwdown. I toss out a Brinsley Schwartz tune, only to be rebuffed by one from Michelle Shocked. I match you for Leadbelly with a little Caetano Veloso, and Tom Waits for the 13th Floor Elevators. It goes on and on, and we are both impressed. Meanwhile, people are standing around waiting for us to pick a record they can dance to. So, here are my picks, just in case Jill & Nicki ask me to run the whole show. And really, shouldn’t they?

Come Dancing—The Kinks

Of course this song is a shameless invitation to dance.

Recounting the mutability of life as depicted by the “local palais”-cum-bowling alley-cum-car park-cum-supermarket, Ray Davies used his nostalgia streak to score a late career hit with the Kinks. And in a brilliant stroke of subtlety, he had DJs talking dirty every time they introduced the song.

It’s not so much about nostalgia as it is about his older sister’s sex life, and his awareness of it through his voyeuristic activities. After relating the numerous times that her boyfriends took her out for a dance—replete with the expected climaxes—he wonders if she’d actually come dancing with him. “Come on, sister, have yourself a ball,” he encourages, with perverse slyness.

I said above that this song is a shameless invitation to dance, didn’t I?

Yet, somehow, it never loses its innocence. Perhaps because it’s “only natural” for one to come dancing.

Cabaret—Louis Armstrong

A swingin’ song from a swingin’ show. Sure, we could focus on the ideas of gender identity at the core of the story. Or we could dance with absolute oblivion, leaving behind the knitting, book, broom, and prophets of doom. After offering us wine, a band, and a horn, Louis offers us a table. Take the first three, leave the fourth, and spin on the floor. If indeed all the world is a stage, and life is a cabaret, then we must all be dancers. Don’t worry about the faulty syllogism. Just start celebrating.

Givin’ It Up for Your Love—Delbert McClinton

What’s he givin’ up? Ever’thang. That’s love alright. With a funky white boy groove that shows you that he means it.

Need You Tonight—INXS

From Michael Hutchence’s seductively whispered command of “come over here,” to the in-and-out guitars and the pulsating bass line, this song is drenched in sexuality.

“Slide over here,” he tells her. Why? Is it because her moves are so raw? Because she makes him sweat? Or because he can’t think?

He probably just wants her to come dancing.

Are You Gonna Be There (At the Love-In)?—The Chocolate Watchband

How does one make their mark at a love-in? By defying all the trendy nonconformity, that’s how. By doing something meaningful and permanent. By following this simple bit of advice: “Design the laws that gonna govern your fate.”

It certainly won’t hurt if your song roars as much as it swings, which is the case here.

Get Up Offa That Thing—James Brown

You’re never gonna make your mark at the love-in if you don’t get up offa that thing.

(Do The) Instant Mash—Joe Jackson

It’s all been carefully programmed, from the supermarkets, to cinematic robots, to loosening one’s tie at ten o’clock in the disco-rama. It’s so easy: Lift hand, flick wrist, drop hand, turn around. Just like stacking all those cans. Purposefully designed stimuli await your predictable responses today!

But on the other hand, Joe’s directive to “heat it, beat it, eat it, turn around” sounds like a true moral imperative. It’s better to be safe than sorry, you know.

Friction—Television

“I don’t wanna grow up, there’s too much contradiction” are words that resonate no matter one’s age. And ventriloquism is creepy, no matter one’s age. Silence is spreading as men dig holes. The singer’s eyes are like telescopes as they see everything backwards.

Setting aside the striking visuals, there’s a lot of funk behind this glorious piece of intellectual punk. Fred Smith’s bass line beckons your own bottom end while your upper limbs instinctively follow Billy Ficca’s cymbals. Tom Verlaine’s unhinged vocals are valiantly balanced by his broken-rules guitar work. Richard Lloyd’s slashing riffs and rhythms provide more than enough substance for improvisational dancing in a dirty crowded bar. Or at a more refined Rhinebeck wedding.

Gone Pie—Patti Smith

“Hey there, come and take a walk with me. Stroll into infinity. We’ll stroll along until the dawn is gone.”

Tony Shanahan’s snaky bass figure leads us through Lenny Kaye’s Escher-like guitar staircase. Through the trance-like music, Patti weaves her walk, strolling into a light where “life goes on and on, on and on, hey.” She suggests that we opt for another slice of this pie called life. It wouldn’t be right to argue with a poet who can probably kick your ass.

East Easy Rider—Julian Cope

Technically, the song references the lack of rear suspension on a chopper, to which Peter Fonda attributes his wonky back. Musically, though, the song references a groove you could drive a truck through, and Julian demonstrates what it must sound like when God sings.

(Wish I Could Fly Like) Superman—The Kinks

Into the late 70s miasma of disco machismo came this song. The protagonist is a fun-house-mirror image of the Travolta-inspired Adonises, those with their shirts unbuttoned to their navels, their chains and pectorals shimmering under the mirrored ball. He looks at his puny 126-pound self every morning and has to dress quickly to avoid depression. He wants to fly—in order to take his girl away from the crumbling world around them—but he can’t even swim.

However, as in most things Kinks, there is a bit of irony: According to the ever-trustworthy Ray Davies, the song “knocked the balls off everything else” being played in the disco. Which is why I think it’s well-suited for a wedding between two women.

Beast of Burden—The Rolling Stones

If there’s a dance floor, this song is required. Hopefully, people are good and sweaty by now, too.

Fooled Around and Fell in Love—Elvin Bishop

A perfectly romantic song, with Mickey Thomas testifyin’ about how he gave up the freewheelin’ lifestyle after he found his true love. He wants everyone to know that he has reformed himself, no longer being the user and slut he once was. What better theme for a slow dance?

Let Me Play with Your Poodle—Marcia Ball

Poodles come in different colors, shapes, sizes, and genders. You can trim, shave, and coif them any way you wish! Just remember to keep yours clean.

Got to Give It Up, Pt. 1—Marvin Gaye

You know it’s true love when someone rescues you from being “too nervous to really get down.”

And it’s about time we had some cowbell in this set.

Not Enough Time–INXS

A technical note here: The tight miking on the hi-hat creates an extremely intimate atmosphere. You can hear not only the ‘ting’ of the drumstick on the upper cymbal, but the resonance between it and the lower cymbal. When the cymbals are slightly parted, you feel the sizzle. It’s like you’re inside the hi-hat.

When the first guitar comes in around the 45-second mark, you can sense that it’s just barely being touched, caressed with precisely controlled passion. Combined with Hutchence’s vocals, it puts the entire song on simmer.

The lyrics cook, too, transcending their simplicity. It’s easy to say, “there’s not enough time for every kiss,” and have it sound hopelessly common. But coming from Hutchence, wrapped in the tight sensuality of his band’s playing, the words are an irrepressible, sensual manifesto. “In our fight against the end, making love, we are immortal.” A new thought? No. But it’s still wonderful beyond words.

It’s Happening With You—k.d. lang

Is there a more fitting cordial than this Limoncello Euro-dance-pop ode to love and cake, complete with a funked-out, koto-driven Japanese interlude? If so, spin it!

Jill & Nicki, much love to you both. And may you stroll infinitely.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Awareness

As ubiquitous as the emotional cancers of tattoos and graffiti, the headphone wires slither through the subway commuters. They broadcast a message of insulation, isolation, oblivion, and disregard.

I’ve been frustrated by the “permanently headphoned” before, as they step into my path completely unaware that I’m approaching. As they jostle other riders—okay, we’re all being jostled enough already—while in their little sonic cocoons. And while I can sympathize with them to a degree, I also have to hold them accountable for making others’ commutes less tolerable. Someone on the verge of a bad day doesn’t need careless rudeness on the way to work.

I tried it once. Feeling the need for a bit of escape from this Greatest City in the World and its prodigious noise, I queued up VGPS on my MP3 player. Awash in the pastoral longing for a simpler—and possibly non-existent—time, I carelessly bumped into those around me. I cut people off as they tried to pass me on the platform. I so crowded one woman on the way up the exit stairs that she turned to glare at me. I had no idea that she had even been there.

I’m sure that the “sorry” that I offered her sounded insincere. And what struck me was that I didn’t even hear myself saying it.

I vowed not to wear the headphones again. That I would commute—whether on the subway, on the sidewalk, in the square, or in the corridors—with awareness for those around me. That I would listen for the footsteps behind or beside me, and make way for someone in a bigger hurry than I.

I’m certainly not changing the world. But I am changing my awareness while in it.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

(untitled, re:Zen)

Zero is Zen:

Simply formed and open and empty.

When joined to that which is something,

It multiplies by a factor greater than itself,

Thus returning both to nothing.

14 January 2004

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Swoosh

Before his first diaper change, Michael Eldrick Jones was branded for life. There was not a doubt in his parents’ minds that they were doing the right thing. Sarah and Evan were securing lifetime sponsorship for their soon-to-arrive son. It would bring him many advantages.

The concept of child sponsorship had outlived its initial controversy, and was gaining acceptance throughout the States. It was beginning to catch on in other parts of the world. In exchange for financial aid for the major events and expenses in a child’s life, the parents would agree to have their child display at all times, through identity apparel and other accessories, a company’s logo. It was a bold and shameless step forward in marketing. There was an uproar when it was first introduced. The uproar ceased when prospective parents discovered how much money was available.

The process was not unlike seeking a university scholarship. Corporations published their available sponsorships, to which expectant parents applied. Sponsorship committees reviewed the parents’ application to determine financial and social fit, then probed into their backgrounds to determine what the child’s strengths would probably be. They considered each parent’s educational background, awards, civic involvement, personal and professional accomplishments, and even psychological profile. In some cases, they conducted DNA testing. Competition was fierce among the sponsorship seekers, and even the parents’ competitive style and teamwork were evaluated. The potential sponsors were very thorough, as their reputation was at stake.

The companies offering sponsorships were quite varied. As expected, the first in the game were the sports equipment and apparel makers. Record companies and musical instrument manufacturers joined in, followed closely by software companies. Soft drink makers, fast food companies, and NASCAR also weighed in with attractive programs. Even some universities in Texas and Indiana were offering sponsorships. The thought was that if they sponsored a child and he became a success in their field, the return on investment could be enormous. What better spokesperson for their brand than one they’d sponsored throughout all of life’s changes? Help the kid succeed and he  will be grateful enough to return the favor. Sure there were risks—the kid might not have the killer instinct on the ice or might saw the violin into splinters. But the odds were, with the extensive research that went into each prospective child, that the payoff would be there. Any child that didn’t perform up to standards could be written off as a loss.

To secure their loyalty, the sponsors required the parents and child to put a little skin in the game, too. The child had to maintain certain athletic, academic, and artistic standards, which were established using the parents’ composite characteristics. Civic involvement and mandatory attendance at certain public events–casually termed “public showings”–rounded out the package. Even when considered all together, it wasn’t an onerous burden for the family. There were, of course, penalties for withdrawing from the program.

As for Sarah and Evan, they landed one of the best sponsors available, Nike. Evan had been an All-American in collegiate football, and was courted heavily by several professional teams. He chose instead to go into business and his acumen paid off with several successful hi-tech startups. Sarah had been a track-and-field Olympian, then a motivational speaker, prior to focusing on children. The new family was a perfect fit for the corporation. They were proven performers.

Mirroring their past performances, the Joneses negotiated a very advantageous deal. Delivery of their new child would be paid for completely, with no worries about all the little things that insurance wouldn’t cover. To this they added tuition from Montessori through under-graduate, the finest medical insurance package, braces and eyewear, if necessary, as often as necessary.

All they had to do in return was have the Nike logo visible on their child any time they were out in public. This was hardly a chore–it was easy to find clothes with the Nike logo, for they were everywhere and everyone was wearing them. But for the Joneses it was even easier: Nike provided the child’s wardrobe from birth until he tossed his mortarboard hat into the air.

It was too good to believe, almost like getting a child for free. They had to pay none of the expenses associated with raising a child, and for such a small concession.

They had joked with their Nike account representative about co-branding. Evan actually thought the hyphenated surname of “Nike-Jones” sounded rather bold and catchy, but the representative assured them that Nike wasn’t as unethical as their competitors. They didn’t want to intrude into the family tree. Simple visual branding was sufficient.

They negotiated the deal right up to their due date, inking it only hours before Sarah gave birth to a beautifully healthy 7-pound-10-ounces baby boy, whom they promptly named Michael. Evan couldn’t resist the visual similarities between their son’s certain nickname and the name of his sponsor. If you suffixed a ‘y’ it even sounded the same.

The late night delivery was considered easy by those not physically involved, and mother and baby were separated as is the norm in modern hospitals. After seeing Sarah to her room, Evan walked to the waiting area, where he was met by two sets of proud grandparents and an equally happy Nike executive. After a champagne toast everyone retired to their homes and hotels.

Evan arrived at the hospital late the next morning, eager to see his new son and to celebrate with his wife, who overnight had acquired that mysterious radiance, authority, and omniscience known as motherhood. They shared a few private moments, then sent for little Mikey.

The room was filled with awe, tears, and laughter as they cuddled and cooed with their son. They had never imagined the joy they now experienced holding their own child. Since they’d taken such care for his future, they were spared the weight of realization that hits so many parents when they look into the face of their helpless infant. They double-counted his toes and fingers, gently worked all his little joints, and tried to determine which features he received from each of them. Already he looked strong and confident, seemingly marked for success. He was certainly starting with a definite advantage.

Sarah fed him, then called for the staff to return him to the nursery for a few hours. Just before they took him away, Sarah asked to lift the small bandage on his right temple. It was part of the agreement, but she still felt a little shock upon seeing the small black Swoosh tattoo.

(Copyright © 2003, Kevin Archer)

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

(untitled, re:Mendocino)

The sun comes late to Mendocino:

Stumbling in over the mountains

Seeking therapeutic waters.

It hovers over the Pacific,

Contemplating, perhaps, a bath drawn too coldly.

Reaching its fingers to test the waters,

They shiver upon the surface,

And a day’s labor cannot produce a simmer.

Knowing it can wait but cannot procrastinate,

At evening it dives in,

Shuddering across the horizon.

22 June 2008

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Lessons from Willie McGee

(This entry first appeared at my other site, chefkevinarcher.com.)

This summer I read “The Eyes of Willie McGee,” by Alex Heard. It is easily one of the most compelling books I’ve ever picked up. It deals with a very dark topic: the alleged rape of a white woman by a black man in mid-1940s Mississippi, his repeated trials and appeals, and his ultimate execution. The storyline might seem familiar, for it was echoed in 1960’s “To Kill a Mockingbird” by Harper Lee. The main difference is a big one: with Heard’s book, there is not one bit of fiction. It wasn’t a neatly resolved story, either, and there are still too many loose ends to categorize.

The scope of the book is astonishing, as the usual suspects—the Klan, local lynch mobs, random unaffiliated racists—are joined by multinational Communist organizations, labor unions, New York journalists and attorneys, Faulkner, Einstein, an abdicating NAACP, and dozens of nonprogressive jurors. As John Grisham succinctly states in a blurb on the book jacket, the story is “sad and tragic.” There is not a happy ending for anyone; justice wasn’t done, but politics were.

The book’s value as a historical document is immense, as its central event illustrates the general condition of US attitudes and policies towards race at that time. Jim Crow laws were still in place, but waning amidst much violent resistance. The civil rights movement was in infancy, and we witness the unfortunate power struggles of various groups wanting to bear Mr. McGee’s likeness on their banner.

As I read, I felt great indignation for those involved in such a gross miscarriage of justice. I felt deeply rooted compassion and sorrow for those who were wronged. I also learned something very unexpected and extremely powerful: what happens when someone feels betrayed.

The betrayal of which I’m speaking was displayed by white citizens of Laurel, MS, as numerous nationwide groups, with a largely white membership, ‘interfered’ in the county’s and state’s legal systems.

This sense of betrayal begat strong reactions, most of them violent, as clandestinely organized assaults were carried out on the interlopers. Mr. McGee’s life was always in jeopardy, as he was housed in the county jail for years during his three appeals. To quell outbreaks, militia was brought in to guard the courthouse at various times. The list goes on, but what rang out above all of this was that the citizens of Laurel felt truly betrayed by their ‘own kind.’

I state this not as a justification, for there is no way to justify what was done. I’m simply observing the behavior that was presented. It was much like the murder of George Hanson in “Easy Rider,” as the decidedly square small-town lawyer was viewed as a traitor for joining up with hippie bikers Wyatt and Billy.

I received an epiphany of sorts as I read this book. That epiphany is this: that many vegans and animal rights activists, due to the intensity of their actions or statements, are triggering the same betrayal-based responses among more mainstream citizens.

The declaration that animals are the equals of humans–or even superiors, in some activist circles—is the same as the anti-Jim-Crow cries of equality between blacks and whites.

The civil rights movement had both violent and peaceful contingents. In the long run, the outcome was beneficial, as the country’s laws clearly protect all of us, equally. Bigotry still exists, racial hatred still exists, and certainly there are still miscarriages of justice. But we have come a long way legally.

We should not anticipate the same outcome for animal rights. I do not say this to be defeatist. It is simply a rational conclusion, for animals cannot participate in this struggle the same way humans can. Animal rights activists often claim to be speaking for those who have no voice—and it is this absence of a voice puts them at a distinct disadvantage. It was hard enough for hardcore racists to hear those who could speak, using the same language.

The animal rights movement might find its own Atticus Finch, one who can speak uber-eloquently in defense of his clients. But the opposition will be quick to point out that the clients did not in fact hire Mr. Finch, Esquire.

This makes it all the more important that those of us who wish for more fair treatment of animals purge all hostility from our own efforts. Our cause is noble, it is good, it is progressive, and it will benefit millions of lives, human included. But we will hinder our own efforts if we push so hard and violently that we trigger this very primitive and fundamental emotion.

Until animals develop the ability to speak in the myriad languages of humans, their cause is severely handicapped. Therefore, those of us who can speak ‘on their behalf’—which is monumentally presumptuous on our part—must be diligent to make our arguments well-reasoned and balanced, which will appeal to humans’ compassion and dignity, rather than attacking humans ad nauseam for their inhumanity. This latter approach will only produce more violent and committed resistance. By employing the former tact, we can possibly make some headway.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Site changes underway

For the umpteenth time since its inception, this site has been emptied and remodeled.

Why? In pursuit of a better, brand-new you!

Via me.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment